On Fri, 14 May 2010 18:55:11 +0300 "Ville M. Vainio" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok terry. Please move it to happen as late as possible :) Alright. So you can't recall why you didn't use leo's general hook mechanism? I'm leaning towards sticking with that, unless you think it has issues. I think it would be good if it had some concept of commander specific callbacks which were dropped when the commander was destroyed, other than that it seems ok to me. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
