On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be easy to represent a Leo outline as a set of FluidDB objects. All sorts of thoughts arise from this flexible structure. It permits, but does not require, the DAG structure required for do Leo's clones. Otoh, every object has a unique identifier, so we could use the something more like the code snippet approach. In other words, data structure is just not a problem: the only questions are about how to view the data. I've always considered Leo's DAG structure to be *more* flexible visually than a general graph because the concept of clones (subgraph) is natural in DAG's. But perhaps the complete flexibility of general graphs is more natural in some contexts. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
