On Aug 2, 10:54 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We must show that moving the node > out of the tree can not change the nodes visited by the traversal > later on: the same nodes will be visited. For once clones do not affect the code, although moving a child of a clone *may* affect the nodes visited later on in the traversal. I'll try to make this clearer tomorrow :-) Really, though, the traversal will "just work". At every point of the traversal, p is a valid position, such that all ancestors in p.stack exist. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
