[Edward] > Yes, it would be possible, but this is the first I have heard of > markdown, and rST seems more than adequate for what we do here. So > it's not going to happen from me. What you do is your own affair :-)
FYI: Markdown "allows you to write using an easy-to-read, easy-to-write plain text format, then convert it to structurally valid XHTML (or HTML). ...is two things: (1) a plain text formatting syntax; and (2) a software tool, written in Perl, that converts the plain text formatting to HTML." -- http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/ So in essence it comes from the same itch as rst but with a narrower focus and different, smaller, syntax (http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/dingus). It is reasonably popular and I expect sooner or later someone will be interested in building a parser for Leo. Here are some opinions on the relative merits of each and when to use them: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34276/markdown-versus-restructuredtext [Gour] > ...wonder if it could be possible to provide e.g. markdown plugin which > could work within Leo similarly to rst-plugin? I'm a bit confused. Pandoc's website says it already provides conversion between rst and markdown, so what would a Leo markdown plugin be used for? -matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
