On Aug 9, 10:59 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
A few post-scripts:
> The new organization of options seems like the most general scheme
> possible because it handles all possibilities related to what Leo has
> a "right" to know about. The new organization, while not exactly
> simple, looks like the simplest that could possibly work.
1. Conceivably, regex's would expand the kind of syntax that the @rst3
command "knows about". Maybe something like::
@ @rst-syntax name action regex
I include this for completeness *only*. It ties the present
conclusions with the former musings about scripting. But I do *not*
intend to do this: I dislike regex's, and there seems to be no need
for this anyway.
2. The notion of @rst-markup doc parts begins to seem dubious in the
new "refactored options" scheme. The new way would allow markup to be
inserted regardless of mode. But I suspect that @rst-markup is here
to stay: it's an explicit description of what is wanted, namely the
insertion of "raw" rst markup into the (output) intermediate file.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
