On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> but I think you can write > > exec g.findTestScript(c,'@common leoRst test code') Sure, but I wanted to get rid of the explicit exec and put it in g.findTestScript. No matter. I'm resigned to the exec. It kinda growing on me. Experimentation shows that it is *really* nice to be able to tweak the test harness in unitTest.leo rather than leoTest.py. This is a surprisingly big step forward. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
