Hi,
Well I think that there is a lot of narratives for different people.
That's the important point. Thanks for the links.
Cheers,
Offray
On 09/29/11 16:53, Arin Basu wrote:
:-), I think I am with Edward on this one. I find the Poignant guide to be a
little fluffy as well. Both "Programming Ruby" and the "Little Book of Ruby"
are quite well written and to the point, as are Satish Talim's notes.
/Arin
"There's a crack, a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in." (Leonard Cohen)
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Edward K. Ream<[email protected]>wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
<[email protected]> wrote:
Several times the connection between code and narrative/literature has
been discussed here.
Why’s (Poignant) Guide to Ruby...is a real different and nice guide to
understand a language. It has been inspirational about other documents I'm
writing and I hope you enjoy it too.
It's inspirational to me too: I want to do exactly the opposite :-)
As a programmer, I find the cutesy stuff boring, if not offensive the
first time. It would be nothing but irritating the second or any
later time.
Speaking just for myself, I always want to get to the heart of the
matter with the absolute minimum of useless words, pictures or
whatever.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
