The game of go, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_%28game%29, abounds in distinctions.
Besides heavy/light, another "supreme" distinction is between thick and thin. Thickness is good, being thin often leads to ruin :-) For Leo, being thick means being on a solid foundation. Python itself is part of Leo's thickness, but the most obvious contributor to thickness are Leo's unit tests and other testing mechanisms such as test scripts. I doubt that the thick/thin distinction will be as provocative as light/heavy, but we shall see... Go also taught me, ironically, about another life distinction, namely that one can only be happy if one can be happy where you are, *not* after you have, or have not, accomplished one or more goals. It's *getting* to the goals that either is, or is not rewarding. I used the word "ironically" above because I have chosen not to play go much, if at all, precisely because playing and studying go do not seem half as interesting, exciting and rewarding as working on Leo, studying the vast world of computer tools, and inventing ways of combining Leo with the outside world :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
