On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:56 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > The approach i suggested early on was letting QTextEdit handle stuff that is > now handled in leoEditCommands. This would kill lots of code that could be > considered redundant
Ah, but would it be redundant? QTextEdit doesn't do *Leo* undo, and doesn't know about the status line, etc. The code in leoEditCommands isn't so redundant as you might suppose: there isn't much waste, fraud or abuse there ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
