I think I am using @rst in an awkward way, and would appreciate a few pointers.
To document live code with rst2, I used subheading in the code like <<subroutine>> and then cloned that node and put it into the rst doc tree. That doesn't work anymore: <<nodes>> are not recognized by rst3, so I'm converting those clones to "@rst-no-head label". In the the live code I have to replace <<subroutine>> with @others. That's awkward at times. All this requires a bit of fiddling. Am I missing the point of rst3? There must be a better way... Any suggestions? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
