On Oct 12, 2:53 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday, I made leo x.y work like scite x.y, *provided* that x.y > exists. Today, I realized that leo x.y *doesn't* work like scite x.y > when x.y doesn't exist. So part of this evening's work will be to > make sure that leo x.y *does* work like scite x.y when x.y doesn't > exist :-) Done at rev 4584. All unit tests pass, but that is no guarantee. Please report any problems immediately: Leo's startup read logic is surprisingly complex. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
