On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, ne1uno <[email protected]> wrote: > shouldn't there be some way to incorporate the sense of levels in unit > tests?
I don't need such levels: Instead, I select the desired tree in unitTest.leo and hit Alt-4, which *in unitTest.leo* is bound to run-selected-unit-tests-locally. In theory I could create a new "local test" tree, exactly analogous to a "view" tree, by cloning desired nodes and putting them under the local test tree. Then I would select the local test tree and hit Alt-4. In short, unitTest.leo can *already* represent arbitrarily many *sets* of unit tests, with no required hierarchical relationships between the sets! This is an ironic feature of Leo outlines: they can represent *any* set of sets, even though the mechanism is based on (quasi) hierarchical outlines. Do you see? Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
