> Or, we could use this as an excuse to migrate to github / bitbucket ;-).
On pro for this is that both github and bitbucket provide integrated wikis. A github advatantage over bitbucket is web pages (http://pages.github.com/) which are part of the SCM, and include a subdomain. e.g. there could be http://leo.github.com for all the docs. All code, pages, and collaborative wiki under one roof. It bears mentioning that Fossil does all this too without being tied to a particular hosting provider (excepting a free subdomain name). If a move is made, I selfishly vote for bitbucket because I use Hg for other things would prefer to consolidate my core toolset; I only use bzr to keep Leo up to date. (Though I see there is a plugin for hg which purports to allow using a git repository, http://hg-git.github.com/). I think/hope bitbucket will provide pages too at some point. I'm conscious that my being a teeny weeny almost non-existent contributor to leo code means my opinion carries little weight, and hesitated to push send because of that. I also possess a high opinion of my own views and tend to be nosiy, it appears that today the latter won. ;-) -- -matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
