I would like the facility to flag a given node in order to disable editing 
it from within Leo, but still leave it receptive to reading incoming 
changes from the filesystem. These are generally within @shadow trees.

Is there such a beast? Not requesting that there be, just inquiring.

I imagine that making such a facility recursive, applying to the nodes 
below, would cause further clone-war-style problems.


====================
Sidetrack on @ignore - probably mostly off-topic to the above

I had thought from reading this
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor/browse_thread/thread/bac65cb75484f7cb?pli=1

that I could use @ignore to prevent my edits within Leo from being written 
out to the filesystem, but seeing that's 3+ years old, 


and having found little other doc guidance on explicitly **using** @ignore 
for content nodes (as to opposed settings, or leo automatic use of them for 
data loss prevention)


and having found many explicit statements along the lines of:

"@ignore is forbidden in any @file trees" (
  - including @shadow? 
  - all @ <file> type directives?
  )


I have decided to ignore @ignore for the moment. . .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/leo-editor/-/-MDUVHj8vtUJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.

Reply via email to