On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, HansBKK <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm just starting to realize the possibilities offered by the search > function, especially since I've been using a standardized naming syntax in > my node headers. > > There may be a very good reason why the the search results return separate > results for each clone, but I'm finding that doesn't help my use case, and > has become redundant since finding goto-next-clone, which I have bound to > Alt-N.
The clone-find-all command returns one result for each node, no matter how many times it is cloned. This is usually good enough. As you imply, it would be conceivable to add a "once-per-clone" checkbox in the Find dialog, but this isn't going to happen any time soon. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
