To my original question I followed the recommendations of Terry. It
was much easier as I thought! Here a summary of the use of custom
roles in Leo to generate LaTeX "inline markup" from Leo:
+ @ rst-no head Defining the custom role, here applicable to html and
latex syntax
.. role:: raw-role(raw)
:format: html latex
+ @A document section
This is my text including an example of inline markup for
generating :raw-role:`\LaTeX\` from Leo. For more details see :raw-
role:`\cite{rstDocumentation}`. Of course, my bib database below will
describe this citation with plenty of details.
+ @rst-no-head Including the bib database
.. raw:: latex
\bibliographystyle{acm}
\bibliography{myBibliography}
It worked really fine!
I haven't followed the recommendations of HansBKK trying Pantoc and
markup-conversion pivot-tables, but I read that there is a new
discussion on this.
Thanks a lot!
On 17 Jan., 05:34, Terry Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:49:33 -0800 (PST)
>
> Juaco <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is of course not the best way.
> > How to convince Leo/Sphinx/RsT to generate the inline raw latex
> > syntax?
>
> http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#raw-data...
>
> ?
>
> Cheers -Terry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
