On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> These type-check assertions will be a vital consistency check. For those of you (myself included) who are uneasy with type checking, let me restate the situation this way: the confusion between the *values* of strings in Leo's key-handling code is a symptom of missing *classes*, not merely missing type checks. Omitting these classes is the only serious design mistake I have ever made with Leo. It's been a doozy. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
