On Feb 21, 6:31 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> what is likely to happen for most people, myself included. We'll get > excited, and then (quickly or not) go right back to our old ways of doing > things. If you disagree, think of how many excuses you have already made for > our present tools, including Leo. It will take work to hold open the space of possibilities. A lot of work. Leo needs to be much more interactive. Here is another of Bret's projects: http://worrydream.com/MagicInk/bart_widget_demo.html Notice how the title of the map changes. On a programming level, the challenge is creating this level of interactivity. Is JavaScript fundamentally more interactive than Qt? Hard to believe... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
