On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:33:00 +0800 "Zoom.Quiet" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/2/21 Edward K. Ream <[email protected]>: > > I've got to learn javascript in order to read the MooTools sources :-) > > > > - life with leanning, forever ;-) > - for javascript > - if for Ajax, jQuery is funny and feel good than mootools > - for web dev. node.js is power with coffeescript ;-) > and js is realy beautyful lang. with some ugly design: > - maybe this is the reason to make people creat sooooo many > crzy tools for js dev. I use jQuery a lot and find it very good, I looked at MooTools a long time ago, I forget my opinion of it then. Did Kent mention a "java-script - what we got right" presentation once, that acknowledged lots of annoying design in java-script (hence Zoom.Quiet's point about all the different layers available to make it bearable), but also covered some of its strengths? Surely the MooTools source in available in non-minimized form, if not I would say it's not open source. The minimized form should be built automatically from a properly formatted / commented / sensible variable name version you should be able to get from the dev. site. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
