Thank you Matt for verifying my observation and the example node to demonstrate the bug.
I've just searched through the bugs and found this https://bugs.launchpad.net/leo-editor/+bug/882243 So I guess that this is a known issue. Unfortunately, It doesn't appear to be considered to be a serious bug and will not be fixed anytime soon. On Friday, July 6, 2012 5:15:52 AM UTC+1, Matt Wilkie wrote: > > I get the same behaviour. I thought might be because Leo detected a > syntax error or something in the code, but it persists when I use .txt > instead of .py. I encourage you to file a bug. > > Copy & paste as node (ctrl-shift-v) the following into leo to reproduce: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > <!-- Created by Leo (http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html) > --> > <?xml-stylesheet ekr_test?> > <leo_file xmlns:leo="http://www.leo-editor.org/2011/leo"; > > <leo_header file_format="2"/> > <vnodes> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1396" a="E"><vh>@file myCode.txt</vh> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1397" a="E"><vh>function 1</vh> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1399"><vh>block 1</vh></v> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1400" a="E"><vh>block 2</vh> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1401"><vh>block 2, sub 1</vh></v> > </v> > </v> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1398" a="E"><vh>func2</vh> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1402"><vh>func2, block 1</vh></v> > <v t="maphew.20120705210033.1400" a="E"></v> > </v> > </v> > </vnodes> > <tnodes> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1396">Attempt to reproduce something > reported by Felix74 on leo-editor. Given the following structure, why > does the clone `codeBlock1b` (and children), not get written to > myCode.py in function2? > > function1 > codeBlock1a > codeBlock1b > codeBlock1bi > function2 > codeBlock2a > codeBlock1b(clone) > > @others > </t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1397">this is func1 > </t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1398">this is func 2 > </t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1399">this is func1, code block 1 > > </t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1400">this is func1, code block 2 > it is a clone > </t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1401">this is func1, block2, sub1 > a child of a clone</t> > <t tx="maphew.20120705210033.1402">this is func2, block 1 > it should be followed by a clone, block 2, from func1. > And indeed it is in the leo file, but not in the @file.</t> > </tnodes> > </leo_file> > > > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:16 PM, felix74 wrote: > > Just started using leo and have the following problem creating python > > program using @file > > > > Outline > > ===== > > > > @file myCode.py > > function1 > > codeBlock1a > > codeBlock1b > > codeBlock1bi > > function2 > > codeBlock2a > > codeBlock1b(clone) > > > > > > when the file myCode.py is created function1 contains all the code in > > codeBlock1a and codeBlock1b(+ subnodes). > > However, function2 only shows codeBlock2a and codeBlock1b(+ subnodes) > are > > missing from myCode.py. > > > > How do I get codeBlock1b(+subnodes) to be output to file myCode.py in > > function2? I am using @others to insert codeBlock(s) into the file. All > the > > code that goes into myCode.py is created inside leo. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/leo-editor/-/mKqm1yMAp8QJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
