It seems to me the most profitable approach for an IDE for a dynamic language is to create more intuitive ways for programmers to interact with the code. For example the Light Table work: http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/04/12/light-table---a-new-ide-concept/
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:48:42 PM UTC-8, F.S. wrote: > > Edward, > Any plan to apply the insights you've gained from studying the subject to > creating a better semantic code browser/autocompleter for Python? Unlike > the stc you can let the programmer deal with ambiguities in the case of > autocompletion/code tips. By semantic I mean it is not just based on regex > tag matching. ... I use vim/cscope/pycscope combo to do code browsing for > large code bases. It is very fast but unfortunately it is not complete and > depends on tag matching that tends to produce too many answers or not > enough at the same time. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/leo-editor/-/c-m5t4CxD1IJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
