Thanks, appreciate the suggestions. Will work on them and update (by regular text instead of Leo file) when I have some code to show.
On Thursday, May 2, 2013 6:21:52 PM UTC+2, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Fidel Pérez <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Here is the list of ideas I couldn't explain better than with a Leo file. > > > Thanks for these ideas. I did take a look at them briefly. As I said in > another thread, some might make good plugins. > > I think you would get more responses here (on leo-editor google group) if > you would discuss your ideas *without* using a .leo file. We are all busy > here, and any extra steps required to find your ideas will cut down on the > responses. > > There is an interesting irony here. On the one hand, Google's Gmail > client pretty much sucks, because all threads are treated as a single > object. I know of no way to assign labels to individual messages. Otoh, > we can't easily pass Leo nodes around in the email either. > > For me, the solution might be to use Leo to imports *parts* of threads > into Leo nodes, where I could arrange them at will. But this is another > project... We discussed this at: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/leo-editor/has$20anyone$20written/leo-editor/i_U-PBv0Ek0/LXm6a0n8_JwJ > and I proposed a prototype script. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
