On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:32 PM, HaveF <[email protected]> wrote: > > The tutorial is shorter and better now. >
Thanks. > > I believe, to the end users, about the unittest feature, the most > important thing is: > ** > Combine their existing test codes with leo, not study leo, not study leo's > unittest way. > (Of course, they are important and convenient, but the users don't care.) > ** > > A short tutorial is just like a ad, the aim of it is to > attract potential users to use it. > I've thought about this a bit before answering. The tutorial I wrote was intended to convey the essential features of Leo's unittest capabilities. This it did. A "marketing" tutorial about unit tests would be useful and valid, as would a tutorial about how to run existing unit tests from Leo would also be good to have. I invite you to create such tutorials, if you like. In my experience, short tutorials are much easier to write than long ones. In short, I am thinking of tutorials as strictly limited to one small topic. This makes it possible to digest the material in a tutorial easily. We could imagine a library of dozens of tutorials, each with a narrow focus. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
