On 5/15/2013 9:35 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:03:47 -0700
Matt Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Kent,
I agree with the principle, that command completion is aided by good
quality names, but I don't understand why you think "print-xxx" as a
command to send something to a printer is not standard. Can you elaborate?
I think Kent meant the older commands
print-all-uas
print-bindings
print-buttons
print-commands
print-focus
print-node-uas
print-plugin-handlers
print-plugins-info
print-settings
would be better named list- or show-, so as no to intermingle with the
new print-(to the printer) commands.
Cheers -Terry
As a concession, I could rename all of my print- commands to printing-
(name of the plugin) or printer- , but I generally agree that the older
ones would make more sense now as list- or display-. I can definitely
see why they were named print- previously, as print has a connotation
among programmers to mean "to the screen" rather than "to the printer".
I'd rather not rename my print- commands, though... they're already
pretty long, and just descriptive enough, I think.
-->Jake
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
