Well actually there is one problem I don't see the solution yet:

The main issue Im trying to address is that, if you are to make a button 
out of some weird text, in my oppinion, Leo should make the button anyway, 
that was the main purpose of my suggestion. It will also display the 
literal text into the buton.

So with my fix, if you want leo to just make the button, you set the value 
to true and you are set. It will both dont care about not making a command, 
and set the text to what you intend.

Through your fix, we still have the problem of having to check the text, 
figuring out if its valid for a command or not, then provide valid text for 
a command given its not valid, then provide the new text we want as name.
So in case your fix is the final solution, I would like to know if there 
would be a way to just let Leo forget about the command (or make a random 
command name) in case the provided text is not valid for a command name, 
instead of the user having to worry about that.

Im sorry I was not specific enough or able to describe/clearly specify my 
concern in the previous post, and if there is something I am missing/not 
understanding I am grateful for your insights.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to