On Saturday, June 29, 2013 7:33:35 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David McNab <[email protected]>wrote:
>
 

> The whole computing world is headed into the cloud, and if Leo is to stay 
>> relevant, it needs to go there as well.
>>
>
> I have mixed thoughts about this.  If we could magically make Leo work in 
> the cloud, then that would be great.  However, I don't want to maintain two 
> code bases, one in js and one in python.  And nobody else will want to 
> maintain two code bases either.
>

When I wrote this reply I missed the fact that the approach is based on the 
Leo bridge, which contains all of Leo's core.  So Terry's way would *not* 
seem to require Python in js, at least not write away ;-)

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to