On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 5:16:09 AM UTC+2, Terry wrote: > > I think the term "rich text" is being used informally to mean "text > with bold / italic / color / bullet lists / etc." edited in a wysiwyg > way. The only file format being considered is HTML. >
Yes, actually that is the way I meant "rich text" in my original post. Whether it's M$'s RTF or ant other similar format, I don't care. Even an HTML-like format would be nice. The benefits of WYSIWYG should not be overlooked, I believe. WYSIWYG is useful not only for seeing what the output will be, but also for having the stored info accessible in an immediate visual way. That is, even when you don't need to print it out or to export it. A PIM-oriented use of Leo will greatly benefit from a rich text format, because a lot of the text that you store will need to be underlined, highlighted, etc. Another valuable text format is the strikethrough. All these text formats, which are a given in the world of modern computing, do have real benefits. It's not just a matter of wanting rich text for using fancy fonts... Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
