Edward, thanks for posting your fiat. It's clear and unequivocal, and I appreciate it. There's already too much nosiness going on in the world, we don't need (nor want) more of it.
Rob............ On Friday, August 9, 2013 2:37:31 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > This is the first, and I hope the last, fiat that I have ever issued > concerning Leo. > > It is a gross violation of my standards and principles to have Leo or it's > web site gather *any* kind of data automatically. Abandon all hope of > changing my mind on this topic. > > As long as I have anything to say about Leo, "opt out" data collection > policies will not be tolerated. Otoh, it would be good to ask people to > tell us that they are Leo users, and I think we should do this asap. > > Edward > > P.S. The question of how many active users Leo has, although mildly > interesting, has, fundamentally, nothing to do with whether using Leo is > right for any particular person or company. Everyone must answer that > question for themselves, based on the merits. I have no attachment > whatever to whether any person or organization uses Leo. > > EKR > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
