On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:17:04 -0500 > "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2. what does p.self_and_subtree() return? > > Ideally, same as it would anywhere else, if it were possible to > construct a sufficiently functional position for this task. > Wrong answer. All of Leo's iterators would have to change for existing code to work as it does presently. Let's be clear. The proposal is for an explicit addition to the public interface for Leo's commander that would create evil special cases just about everywhere. I cannot allow such a thing. It's a truly bad idea. It's time to end this discussion. Leo 4.11b1 beckons... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
