Imo, the answer is simple: resistance to change. Programmers have a lot invested in their tools. To be worth serious consideration, Leo must offer something much better. Furthermore, most programmers likely see moving to Leo as risky. Using Emacs or vim will seem like a much safer choice.
That's why @shadow, @auto and (eventually) compatibility mode are so important. They offer ways for programmers to migrate to Leo gradually, without affecting their programming team. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
