On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:08:47 -0700 (PDT) "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I propose that lines consisting only > of the characters \n will indicate a blank line that appears in an > abbreviation. I can't think of any reason you'd want a line consisting solely of r"\n" in the limited context of defining abbreviations, or in general, so that seems like it should work, would certainly be easier to read. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
