After reading several posts by Edward about clones and refresh-from-disk 
command dangers, I've come to the conclusion that I may be using clones 
incorrectly, or at least having unrealistic expectations for them. One of 
the features of Leo that attracted me in the first place was the ability to 
use clones to write data once and see/use it in multiple ways and places. 
However, after destroying a file that contained cloned nodes because my 
administrative assistant refreshed her copy of the file from disk, I 
figured that I need a different strategy.

Edward's comments about using clones to help with work flow makes sense in 
that context, but it's not what I'm wanting the clones to do. Are my 
expectations unreasonable? Here's my scenario:

Suppose I have a node with information about some file such that 
right-click>open URL opens the file for printing or whatever... That 
information link (node) needs to appear in more than one place in the file 
(the outline) so I cloned the node and had it appear in those other 
contexts (all within the same plain text file). This actually worked for us 
for a while until recently when I made a lot of changes to the structure of 
the file and asked her to refresh the file inside of her Leo file. Ever 
since then, all the cloned nodes disappeared and the file became 
essentially useless.

1) Should clones be able to work for this? If not, what other strategy 
might work?
2) What other strategy should I consider for us to work on and use the same 
shared file? (No, we can't really use any kind of CVS system. It was all I 
could do to teach her the basics of using Leo, much less that...)

Suggestions appreciated! Best regards,

Rob...............


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to