On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:53:25 -0600 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jacob Peck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think this speaks volumes for why people are so resistant to change, even > > users... Leo does things just a bit *differently*, and people ignore it or > > avoid it for fear of breaking these inalienable 'laws' they subscribe to. > > > > On the contrary, I think there are good reasons to resist change. We all > try to drink from fire hose, and we all have big investments in present > work flows. My interpretation of Jacob's point was that this is an example of why people are disconcerted by Leo not being the same as Emacs, Sublime, etc., or more generally why people often seem to think you're being unreasonable when you suggest Microsoft Word + Excel might not be the complete set of tools for all possible tasks. Yes, you can spend all your time searching for the perfect workflow / environment, and that's not productive, but you need to periodically assess alternatives. That's why I'm not using Emacs and Freemind any more :-) Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
