Yes, bzr trunk will be enough for main git repo, and it's not like we would be deleting the old repos in the process. On Jan 5, 2014 1:50 PM, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Matt Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> this is a more informative starting point >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19930832/converting-big-bzr-repository-to-git-what-to-expect. >> Initial experiments look like it won't be too bad. I'll have more to report >> later. >> > > Thanks for this, Matt. I personally would be happy just to migrate the > history of the bzr trunk. That will provide > > more than enough data for any future archeologists. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
