Finished editing, here is the pull request, and I think I found a solution for the issue you are commenting.
https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/pull/11 I just made it so every part of unls always get their [int], even if its zero. That way, when reconstructing, if the user named a node [0], in the unl that node will end with [0][0],so no problem. Also added an extra integer for the nth sibling position, I think that is very interesting, and assures we will not have to touch the UNL's for including more information again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
