On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Fidel N <[email protected]> wrote:
> I totally agree with Terry here, I think the visual aspect of Leo should > have more priority. I agree. The thoughts about sentinels files are mostly a thought experiment. It's very useful, imo, because it puts attention on sharing protocols rather than magic attempts to do with sentinels, which has occupied far too much of my thinking in the past ;-) So now I have more attention to devote to other matters. Heh, heh. > As you know, I'm often thinking of the 'reach to the most users' concept, so > I believe that thinking out of the box could lead to more interesting uses > of Leo. My main interest at present is to make it as easy as possible to use fancy stylesheets to do cool things in documents created by Leo. Some programming support will likely be needed, but documentation such as the VR2 how-to will be important as well. > Also, its undeniable that in the long run, it would be great for Leo to > reach Android, IOs, etc. I'll leave that for Ville, or others. > And there is a solution that could solve all the problems. Migrating to > kivy. [snip] Thanks for the heads up. However, I think Qt is a good platform at present. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
