On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> So instead of thinking of views as being defined by sets of nodes with > given identities, it would be better (more general) to think of views > as sets of nodes defined in other ways. Such as: > > - Sets of nodes matching patterns patterns (searches) > - Nodes matching *generalized unl's*. Hmm. But in practice I generally create what amounts to an @view node by actually dragging clones to the node. In that case, we would need an "inverse" process, namely generating the unl's that define the clones from the clones themselves. Hmm again. It's not necessarily an intractable problem. There might be a set of possible unl's that would describe a clone. Leo would somehow pick the highest priority unl. In any case, this is a brand new field of inquiry. Happy Independence day indeed! EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
