On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT) "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now that Scintilla does not seem much of a "salvation", we must, > somehow, work around the QTextEdit loss-of-data bug that Terry's > benchmark script implicitly demonstrates. My full bug report is: > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-41153 Will be interesting to see how they respond to that - does the bug exists in Qt5 and Qt4? Shame QScintilla wasn't a bigger boon - I don't know if it has any other features which would make it worth a switch - line number display perhaps, although I've never really found that a lack. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
