Im normally a power user of such commands, but never saw use on this one specially because of the lack of "traceability", IE, you cycle all but dont know which one is next or which one you are on etc. Well this is my chatty way to say I totally agree, and I like clearness of the focus-to-x thing.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > The cycle-all-focus command is difficult to do properly because it cycles > through a list of widgets that changes as tabs are added to the Log pane. > It has been buggy from day one. > > An alternative would be to create a set of commands each of which puts > focus in a particular pane, for example, the spell tab, or the tab created > by the print-binding command. That is, each command that creates a log tab > would create a corresponding "focus-to-x" command. > > This is more appealing now that Leo supports alt-x history. You would > just have to complete focus-to-<tab> once, and thereafter you could use > Alt-x up/down to pick the desired command. > > In short, I would like to replace cycle-all-focus with focus-to-x > commands. I shall do nothing until I hear all your comments. > > Edward > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
