Davy Cottet has offered to create a Debian distro for Leo shortly after Leo
5.0-final goes out the door. That's great, and I appreciate the effort.
When a leo distro exists, people will be able to do:
(sudo) apt-get install leo
But even without an official leo package, people can just do:
(if needed) apt-get install git
git clone https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor.git
Can somebody *please* explain to me why the first way is far superior to
the second. I just do not get it.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
