OK, thanks for the explanation. Would there be any benefit in having something to that effect mentioned in the online documentation? As I read the description for both @all and @other directives, it was not at all clear what the difference was.
Rob...... On Friday, December 19, 2014 11:05:22 AM UTC-5, Largo84 wrote: > > Using the latest stable version (v5.0-final): > > 1) Create an @file node > 2) Indicate @language (I tried this with html, xml and tex) > 3) Create a node with comments (doc strings) as in: > @ > Some comments. > @c > 4) Use the @others command to include the node(s). The output file has > proper comment markers added (proper based on @language specified). > 5) Use the @all command to include the node(s) instead of @others. *The > output file does *not* have the proper comment markers added.* > > Is this somehow intentional? If so, what's the logic? If not, is this a > bug in the write code? > > Regards, > > Rob............. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
