On Sunday, February 15, 2015 at 6:15:45 AM UTC-6, Steve Zatz wrote: > > I have a python file with a couple of lines that look like: > > #@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
I got your tests files and everything appears to be working with rev 16981fd (or later). This rev changed x.separate_sentinels so that x.check_output doesn't improperly complain about a missing sentinel. In fact, I plan to eliminate the call to x.check_output. It's like to be more buggy than the code it is supposedly testing. Notes: 1. I do not see any line of the form #@xxx anywhere in the two files you sent me. The lack of #@xxx lines means that the test files you sent me don't cover the original problem. 2. I was able to read and write the @nosent node without changes to the .py file. 3. I check for unwanted changes by first creating a git repo and checking the diffs. 4. The only change I made to the .leo file was to replace eliminate the path to your home directory. So now the @nosent node is simply @nosent listmanager.py. I'm not sure what is going on. I wonder whether caching could be a problem. What happens when you try to open the .leo file with --no-cache. It might be better to use the clear-all-caches command. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
