On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 07:07:10 UTC, Matt Wilkie wrote: > > > The only reason I can think of to prefer @auto is >> > > ...it's a better name. :) > > If @nosent is a synonym for @auto, then the code-that-used-to-be-called > @auto can be relegated to history and the code-that-is-now @nosent can be > called @auto. > > It's a subtle thing, but I think having the primary documentation and leo > files using the word "auto" everywhere is better then have "no" splattered > all over the place and in one's face as a daily mantra. > > just a thought. > > -matt >
+1 I definitely agree that @nosent is not a good name; dropping into this good work midway, it took me a while to realise that it referred to (no) sentinels, rather than something not being sent! There is a degree of cognitive dissonance to the '@no... ' form which I think should not be underestimated (said he, almost using a double negative ;-o ) @clean sounds like a good choice to me. Jon N -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.