On Saturday, February 28, 2015 at 9:50:54 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> In short, we expect that Leo will recovered nodes as the result of
reading an @file tree, whether during the initial load or as the result of
refresh-from-disk.
And not just @file trees. As I have just verified, Leo can generate
"Recovered Nodes" trees when reading @clean trees. A bit surprising. A
trace in indicateNodeChanged shows it is called from:
readOneAtNosentNode, which calls...
copyAllTempBodyStringsToVnodes
terminateNode
terminateBody
I have found the "Recovered Nodes" messages essential when making sense of
@clean problems.
And there does seem to be a serious @clean update problem. Comments
inserted (by an external editor) at the start of the file do not get
propagated into the @clean tree anywhere. This is shocking, and it must be
fixed before b1.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
