The wiki could easily be on github -- that keeps code and notes in one
place :)
https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/wiki
The old zwiki (I think) could be revived too, but much of what's out
there is outdated.
-->Jake
On 4/13/2015 10:28 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
Git's distinction between porcelain and plumbing
<http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Plumbing-and-Porcelain>applies
to Leo as well. Imo, Leo's plumbing (code) needs little or no further
work. Oh sure, Leo's code could always be cleaned up, but the value
to Leo's users will be small.
Otoh, Leo's porcelain, the face it presents to others, seems like the
most important area for improvement. Here are the items from the
current Most Important list for Leo 5.2:
- Outreach to editors: we want a magazine to write a glowing article
about Leo.
- Use wiki-like to enable collaboration between Leonistas.
Speculative, but might be important.
- 9 Items about rendering. I'd like to create a unifying framework to
handle all such items.
Your comments, please, Amigo.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
