On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 6:34 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Imagine, you want to store a book list, using three categories: > Author, Title, Topic, each ordered alphabetically. > How could you store your book data without using clones? We might be talking about different things. Your example makes perfect sense, and clones would be essential to simulate various kinds of DB access. But if you wanted just to review each book, you could just create a single list, without clones. You could organize the list any way you wanted, as long as each book appeared exactly once in the list. This was the situation I faced. I just wanted a *single *place for each to-do item. Having said that, I won't mind at all if you truly want to access the data in multiple ways using clones. As you say, that's what clones are for ;-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
