On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 9:01:16 PM UTC-5, Terry Brown wrote: > What was the long standing problem you mentioned you were addressing?
Feeble commit entry for 24906c4. Sorry about that. My first thought was that the log entry was referring to the fact that abbreviation for e;; would ruin the abbreviation for date;;. But no, it was rev 585d2f4 that fixed that. Ah. Now it comes back. There was a case in expand_tree where it looks like do_placeholder will be undefined if old_p.subtree() is an empty iterator. Iirc, this crash actually happened to me. But then I got carried away and tried to clean up the code by only calling find_place_holder if do_placeholder is true. Not sure if this is related to the present reversion... EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
