On Tue, 5 May 2015 10:24:12 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:11 AM, john lunzer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here is an interesting website: http://py3readiness.org/ > > Thanks for the link. Very interesting. Ditto that. I wonder if all the modules listed are valid though - pathtools for instance, I wonder if that's just not needed in Py3... but I guess a wrapper to make code using it run on either would be nice. Personally I tend to use Py2 for "small" tasks, and Py3 for larger things / things I want to last indefinitely. Cheers -Terry > the most harm to Python 3 would come if Guido caves to the pressure > and allows continued development and support (outside of security > updates) to Python 2. > > It wasn't my intention to add to that pressure ;-) > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
