On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:45:16 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 PM, john lunzer <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I do not think auto collapsing the tree should be default, it can be >> disorienting and can destroy a workflow. >> > > Not sure what tree you are talking about now. >
The outline (tree pane). It doesn't seem like a good idea to auto collapse all the nodes in the outline by default after a cfa/cff/cfm/cffm, destroying the visual state of the outline. As you would say, that behavior is automagic (unexpected). This should be an option that should have to be turned on, but be off by default. It would be no different than auto hoisting the root of the cloned nodes after a cfa/cff/cfm/cffm, which I think creates even greater focus without destroying the state of the outline. And would like to see that as an option too after a cfa/cff/cfm/cffm. Additionally would there be a barrier to remembering if a clone is inside a hoisted node or not so that when you switched between a clone inside a hoist to a clone outside a hoist it would return to the hoisted view when you switched back again? > > This is pretty much what chapters *should* do. At present there is a > completely brain-dead restriction that chapters must be children of an > @chapters node. And we probably don't need @chapter nodes either: *any *node > should be able to be the "base" of a chapter. > > I have never investigated chapters, I shall do so and see if they help. If there are restrictions on them that you think inhibit their usefulness then those should probably be removed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
