On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:40 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure that the current implementation is a great choice for on > by default. > It's beginning to look that way. > > John knows what's causing his problem, because it started when he > flipped the setting. If it was on be default, working out why Leo's > laggy would be hard, maybe you'd notice it was related to file access > over a network, maybe not. > I agree: it would be best to have an implementation that scales better. Also, I find the immediate notification of change a bit intrusive, vs. > only notifying when Leo regains focus, like Notepad++. It should be easy enough to queue notices if Leo is not active, and raise them all when Leo activates. This can be done with a single dialog, similar to the dialog that warns that various files may already be open in another copy of Leo. EKR -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
